Logo
Why

Why inga?

Opening the door to the new recruiting world

How inga works

HR experience meets social media

Solutions

inga. for SMEs

Hiring skilled workers at last

inga. for groups

Set scalable & plannable

inga. for personnel consultants

The add-on for personnel consulting

About us
Blog
Free job check

We use cookies.

We use cookies to improve the user-friendliness of our website. By continuing to use our website, you consent to the use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.

Accept allReject
BlogsForward
Job portal prices
Forward
Job portal prices 2025: Why you pay too much and how you can find better people with automation

Job portal prices 2025: Why you pay too much and how you can find better people with automation

Calendar
July 7, 2025
Clock
10 minutes
Corinna Haas
Mitgründerin und Geschäftsführerin der Inga GmbH
Are you investing four-figure sums in job advertisements and waiting months for applications? A single ad often costs over €1,300, but you're not getting any results. Discover how companies like EDEKA and KMLS halve their recruiting costs and fill vacancies in record time.
Request free of charge
Menu
Cost analysisHidden costsKMLS Case StudySCHRAMM success storyEDEKA transformationROI calculationYour guideFAQ
4.9 / 5 Stars
Request free of charge

The topic in a nutshell

Check Mark

The prices for a single job advertisement on top job portals in 2025 are often between €1,399 and €2,399, often with a low ROI.

Check Mark

The average time to fill a position (time-to-hire) in Germany is over 120 days, which results in high hidden costs.

Check Mark

Automated Job-Bots and social recruiting, such as at EDEKA and KMLS, achieve fill rates of over 70% and significantly reduce the cost-per-hire.

The prices for job portals are exploding, but the results are stagnating. In 2025, companies often pay between €1,399 and €2,399 for a single advertisement on leading job boards, only to wait an average of 121 days for a vacancy to be filled. This method is not only expensive, but also inefficient. The real cost is lost time, administrative overhead and unfilled positions that stifle growth. This article shows you why the traditional route leads to a dead end and how automation and social recruiting can not only save you money, but also give you access to the 70% of passive talent who don't even search on job portals.

Cost analysis: What you will really pay for a job ad in 2025

The prices for job portals are a shock for many HR teams. A single 30-day ad on one of the leading platforms quickly costs €1,399. For more visibility with a "Pro Plus" package, you can even pay €1,699. If you need a term of 60 days, the price can rise to €2,399. Even niche portals often charge upwards of €700 for a single placement.

However, this expenditure does not guarantee success. Companies often invest over €4,700 per hire (cost-per-hire) without getting the desired quality. Traditional ad placement has become an expensive gamble. These high fixed costs drain budgets even before a single suitable CV is on the table.

But the pure advertising costs are only the tip of the iceberg, because the real cost drivers lurk in the process behind it.

Hidden cost eaters: Why time-to-hire destroys your ROI

The average vacancy period in Germany is an alarming 121 days. Some studies even show a peak value of 180 days for the beginning of 2025. Each of these days costs money due to unfilled positions and overworked teams. 83% of recruiters in Germany describe the recruitment process as challenging. The manual sifting of applications ties up valuable resources that are lacking elsewhere.

The hidden costs of slow staffing are enormous:

  • Loss of productivity: An unfilled position can reduce team output by up to 25%.
  • Administrative burden: HR employees spend up to 30% of their time reviewing unsuitable applications.
  • High cost-per-hire: The average cost per hire is €4,700, and even over €10,000 for managers.
  • Poor candidate experience: Long processes frustrate top candidates, who then sign up with the competition.

Many overlook the fact that a reduction in time-to-hire of just 10% already significantly reduces recruitment costs. A more efficient process is therefore not a luxury, but an economic necessity. A look at the skilled trades sector shows how this can be achieved even in difficult sectors.

KMLS case study: How a job bot achieves a 76% success rate in the skilled trades

The KMLS Group, a building technology service provider with around 300 employees, was faced with the challenge of finding niche profiles such as service technicians for HVAC or MSR. Traditional job boards for specialists were hardly providing any qualified applicants. KMLS has been relying on inga's recruiting automation for over five years and has achieved a fill rate of 76% in over 50 projects.

The company received an average of 21 verified applications per vacancy. The key to success is a job bot that addresses candidates where they are - on social media. "The job bot is fast, uncomplicated ... talent flows directly into our BMS - the icing on the cake," confirms the KMLS Group. Automated bots reduce the admin workload and reliably fill even niche roles in the skilled trades.

But what if the target group is not even passively active on social media?

SCHRAMM success story: When customized bots win over untraceable experts

The recruiting service provider SCHRAMM specializes in hard-to-reach specialists and experts in the DACH region. Traditional channels fail completely here, as the target group neither actively searches nor responds to standard ads. Instead of a one-size-fits-all solution, SCHRAMM relies on individually programmed bots from inga, which act like a digital headhunter.

These "manual work bots" enable extremely precise targeting that reaches passive candidates where other methods fail. The success proves it: Quality over quantity through customized automation is the key to reaching rare experts. This approach avoids application spam and only delivers truly suitable profiles. This proves that technology and precision can go hand in hand to fill even the most difficult vacancies.

This precision is impressive, but can such an approach be scaled up to fill hundreds of positions?

EDEKA transformation: How social recruiting is turning a traditional brand into a talent magnet

The EDEKA Group, with over 70,000 employees, is struggling with a shortage of skilled workers in logistics, administration and chain store retail. Traditional processes tend to deter talent. Since 2020, inga has achieved a recruitment rate of 72% in over 120 projects for 20 different profiles - from store managers to drivers. The process delivered an average of 21 pre-qualified applications per position.

The solution combines social recruiting campaigns with a job bot. This conducts a short, brand-independent interview and transfers qualified profiles directly into EDEKA's applicant management system. The biggest advantage: this approach activates hard-to-reach target groups in a scalable and efficient way, without additional work for the HR team.

The success factors at a glance:

  • Targeted approach on social media instead of expensive portals.
  • Automated pre-qualification by a 24/7 job bot.
  • Mini-interview without employer brand bias for honest answers.
  • Seamless transfer of data to the existing ATS.
  • Activation of passive candidates for logistics and counter jobs.

These examples show that switching from traditional job portals to an automated strategy is the decisive lever.

ROI calculation: How to reduce your cost-per-hire sustainably

Let's do the math: Three advertisements on premium portals quickly cost €3,000 to €5,000. Add to this 10 to 15 hours of HR work per week for administration and pre-selection. With an average vacancy period of 121 days, the costs quickly add up to over €10,000 per recruitment if you include internal expenses.

An automated approach like inga's is much more efficient here. By eliminating expensive advertisements and reducing manual effort by up to 80%, the cost-per-hire drops dramatically. Companies such as EDEKA and KMLS not only achieve a staffing rate of over 70%, but do so at significantly lower overall costs. The 50% money-back guarantee from inga further minimizes the risk. This makes social recruiting a calculable investment instead of an expensive experiment.

Switching from expensive job portals to a smart, automated solution is therefore not a trend, but a strategic necessity for any future-proof company.

Your guide: 3 steps to more efficient recruiting

Are you ready to leave the high prices of job portals behind and future-proof your recruiting? Instead of continuing to spend money on ineffective ads, you can start with a clear strategy that delivers predictable results. With the right tools, recruitment goes from a game of chance to a predictable discipline.

How to start the transformation:

  1. Analyze costs: Determine your average cost-per-hire and time-to-hire over the last 12 months. How much are you really paying per hire?
  2. Identify pain points: Which 3-5 positions are the most difficult to fill and incur the highest costs?
  3. Request a potential analysis: Use a free analysis to get a data-driven understanding of how many candidates you can reach with an automated approach for your most challenging roles.

The first step towards a solution is to break the inefficient old patterns. With a data-supported strategy, you can transform your recruiting portal from a cost factor into a driver of added value. Request your free potential analysis now and find out how much talent is just a click away for your vacancies.

FAQ

What are the average prices for job portals?

In 2025, prices for a single 30-day ad on large German job portals often range between € 1,300 and € 2,400. Cheaper or niche portals start at around € 700, but usually offer a lower reach.


Why is time-to-hire such an important key figure?

The time-to-hire measures the duration from the job advertisement to the signing of the contract. A long duration (on average over 120 days in Germany) causes high hidden costs due to productivity losses, long training periods and the risk of losing top applicants to faster competitors.


Can you also reach passive candidates via job portals?

No, job portals are used almost exclusively by active job seekers. However, around 70% of the job market is considered to be passive or latent job seekers. You can only reach this valuable target group effectively via channels such as social media or active sourcing.


What is a job bot and how does it work?

A job bot is an automated chatbot that handles the initial contact with applicants. It asks specific questions about qualifications, motivation and availability via social media or a career site, filtering out unsuitable candidates and only forwarding qualified profiles to the HR department. This saves up to 80% of the administrative workload.


Is social recruiting also worthwhile for traditional sectors such as the skilled trades?

Absolutely. The KMLS case study shows that targeted social recruiting and Job-Bots achieved a fill rate of 76% for highly specialized technician profiles in the skilled trades. The approach works across all sectors as it reaches people where they spend their time online.


How quickly can I expect to receive my first applicants if I use inga?

While traditional methods often take weeks, inga's automated approach usually delivers the first qualified and screened applications directly into your applicant management system within the first 7 to 10 days.


Discover more articles now

All articles
June 7, 2025

Find employees innovatively: How Job-Bots increase your hiring rate by 76

Learn more
June 18, 2025

Finding tradespeople: How Job-Bots solve the skills shortage in 21 days

Learn more
June 24, 2025

Find an electronics technician: How to fill vacancies in under 30 days with Job-Bots

Learn more
Logo

+49 69 348 71 92-0

Product
  • How inga works
  • Why inga?
  • Integrations
  • Frequently asked questions
Solutions
  • Success story
  • Success story
  • inga for SMEs
  • inga for corporations
  • inga for personnel consultants
The company
  • About us
  • Press
  • Contact us
Get started
  • Free job evaluation
  • Customer login
Legal matters
  • Imprint
  • Data protection
  • Terms and Conditions

For reasons of better readability, the masculine form is used for personal designations and personal nouns on this website. Corresponding terms apply to all genders in the interests of equal treatment. The abbreviated form is for editorial reasons only and does not imply any judgment.

©2025 inga GmbH